All Documents
39 documents available
Sprint 0 Marking Scheme
**Team Name:** BC Hub
! Project 3: Web APIs & NLP
In week four we've learned about a few different classifiers. In week five we learned about webscraping, APIs, and Natural Language Processing (NLP). This project will put those skills to the test.
Hook Rubric (score out of 10)
1. **Curiosity Gap (0–2)**
Reddit Virality Grading Rubric
This document defines the scoring criteria for evaluating Reddit post/rumour virality potential. Each attribute is scored from **0.0 (no presence)** to **1.0 (very strong)**. These scores are used by the LLM to grade injected rumours before simulation.
Judging Rubric
**AI for Social Good Hackathon – SUST 2026**
QualRubric
The goal of a Qualifying Exam ("qual") is for a student to *effectively demonstrate that they have the knowledge and skills that will be needed to conduct meaningful research in their chosen subfield*. There are a number of key phrases in this sentence:
Decodable Story Quality Rubric
Use this checklist when writing or reviewing decodable readers. The phonics constraints are hard enough—don't let the story suffer too.
Sprint 1 Marking Scheme
**Team Name:** [Byte Peeps]
rawrubric
This rubric defines a **standardised metric** for evaluating how well a software repository implements core **kernel** and **operating‑system (OS)** primitives. It is based on the function manifest and status report from the Echo.Kern project and draws on general operating‑system principles ([Wikipedia: Kernel](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kernel_(operating_system)#:~:text=operating%20system%20%20that%20always,for%20the%20central%20processing%20unit)). The goal is to provide a repeatable method
Criteria 1: Quality of Exploratory Data Analysis (20%) [20]
module_title: Data Science and Machine Learning
Sprint 2-4 Marking Scheme
**Team Name:** [Team Name]
new-rubric
- 4 - All requirements from 3 are met. The application completes all iterations above and implements one or
MessageAI Rubric
**Excellent (11-12 points)**
a99 Final Project
**DUE:** 2022-12-08T15:00 (End of Exam Period)
proj2rubric
| Notes | Self Assessment (Total: 88) | evidence |
proj2rubric
|Notes|Assessment (Total : 87 )|Evidence|
proj3rubric
|Score|Notes| Evidence|Self-Assessment|
Evaluation Rubric for LLM-Generated Outputs
title: Evaluation Rubric for LLM Outputs
proj2rubric
Repository link: https://github.com/agupta15k/ncsu_se_fall22_22_pr_2
TA Grading Rubric
> **Core Principle:** Focus on whether the student has demonstrated mastery of the
RE-Bench Formal Scoring Rubric
RE-Bench evaluates reverse engineering LLMs across seven orthogonal axes:
Sprint 0 Marking Scheme
**Team Name:** [Byte-Peeps]
HW5
|<div style="width:256px">Notes</div>|Assessment|Evidence|
Multi-Framework Scoring Rubric
Scores are 0–10. Higher = better alignment with best practices. The advisor produces five framework scores plus AWS pillar breakdown.