Sprint 0 Marking Scheme

Team Name: [Byte-Peeps]
Github: [https://github.com/UTSCCSCC01/finalprojects22-byte-peeps]

---

summary.md (Max 8 marks)

• Project objectives have been specified clearly (max 2 marks)

  • 2 marks = clearly
  • 1 mark = somewhat clearly
  • 0 marks = not at all

  Your mark: 2

• Key users have been identified clearly (max 2 marks)

  • 2 marks = clearly
  • 1 mark = somewhat clearly
  • 0 marks = not at all

  Your mark: 2 Feedback: Couple more users could have been identified as a potential user like company admin stuff e.t.c

• Scenarios have been described clearly (max 2 marks)

  • 2 marks = clearly
  • 1 mark = somewhat clearly
  • 0 marks = not at all

  Your mark: 1 Feedback: Walter White/Alice was not mentioned in the personas. Need to use the same people in scenarios as in Personas

• Principles have been described clearly (max 2 marks)

  • 2 marks = clearly
  • 1 mark = somewhat clearly
  • 0 marks = not at all

  Your mark: 2

summary.md Total Mark: 7 / 8

---

competition.md (Max 2 marks)

• Competition has been identified clearly (max 2 marks)
  • 2 marks = clearly
  • 1 mark = somewhat clearly
  • 0 marks = not at all

competition.md Total Mark: 2 / 2

---

Product Backlog PB.md (Max 8 marks)

• Sufficient stories created to occupy team for release 1 (max 2 marks)

  • 2 marks = Excellent
  • 1 mark = Few user stories, clearly not enough to occupy team for release 1
  • 0 marks = No user stories

  Your mark: 2

• Relevant persona clearly identified for each user story (max 2 marks)

  • 2 marks = All user stories identify relevant persona
  • 1 mark = Part of the stories do not mention persona
  • 0 marks = No personas mentioned in user stories

  Your mark: 2

• All user stories identify goal/desire and all identify why/benefit (max 2 marks)

  • 2 marks = All user stories identify goals
  • 1 mark = Part of the stories do not identify goals
  • 0 marks = No user story identifies goals

  Your mark: 2

• Writing (max 2 marks)

  • 2 marks = Writing is very clear for all stories
  • 1 mark = Writing is not clear for some stories
  • 0 marks = Writing is poor and with errors

  Your mark: 2

PB.md Total Mark: 8 / 8 Feedback: Depending on how much time you put, this might turns out to be more work than you anticipate at this point. Integrating ML models to your website might be a challenging task, and same for integrating different social media platforms. But I belive, once you are able to integrate one of them using their APIs, others should be similar.

---

Setup (max 3 marks)

• Frontend

  • 1 mark = Frontend setup is complete
  • 0 marks = Frontend is not setup

  Your mark: 1

• Backend

  • 1 mark = Backend setup is complete
  • 0 marks = Backend is not setup

  Your mark: 1

• Database

  • 1 mark = Database setup is complete
  • 0 marks = Database is not setup

  Your mark: 1

Setup Total Mark: 3 / 3

---

Documentation: README.md (max 3 marks)

• Motivation and Project Description

  • 1 mark = Short detailed description of motivation behind the project and why it exists
  • 0 marks = Motivation is missing or has grammar errors/typos

  Your mark: 1

• Installation for your Software/System

  • 1 mark = Instructions for installation process are clear and concise, with provided commands.
  • 0 marks = No instructions or installation section has grammar errors/typos

  Your mark: 1

• Contribution

  • 1 mark = Contribution process is well-explained, allowing contributors to easily get on board
  • 0 marks = Contribution is missing or has grammar errors/typos

  Your mark: 1

README.md Total Mark: 3 / 3

---

Definition of done: done.md (max 2 marks)

• Definition of done is:
  • 2 marks = Relevant to the project and applies to all stories
  • 1 mark = Somewhat relevant and does not apply to all stories
  • 0 marks = Missing or unclear

done.md Total Mark: 2 / 2

---

Personas.pdf (max 8 marks)

• Quality of the persona should be measured based on the presence/absence quality of description of the following elements: Age, personality, personal background Skills, professional background Attitude towards technology, domain, etc. Goals when using the system (max 4 marks)

  • 4 marks = Two or more high quality personas provided

  • 3 marks = Two personas provided but quality is not very good

  • 2 marks = Only 1 persona provided with good quality

  • 1 mark = One persona of poor quality

  • 0 marks = No personas provided

    Your mark: 4

• Relevance to the system (max 2 marks)

  • 2 marks = Personas are highly relevant to the system
  • 1 mark = Personas are somewhat relevant
  • 0 marks = Not all or no personas are relevant

  Your mark: 2

• Persona Descriptions (max 2 marks)

  • 2 marks = Appropriate length and is well-written
  • 1 mark = Short and/or with errors
  • 0 marks = No writing or poor quality

  Your mark: 2

Personas.pdf Total Mark: 8 / 8

---

Process: process.md (max 10 marks)

• Team organization (roles) divided clearly (max 2 marks)

  • 2 marks = Team organization (roles) are divided clearly
  • 1 mark = Unclear team organization
  • 0 marks = Not completed

  Your mark: 2

• Decision making (max 2 marks)

  • 2 marks = decision making is described clearly
  • 1 mark = unclear decision making
  • 0 marks = Not completed

  Your mark: 2

• Prioritizing user stories (max 2 marks)

  • 2 marks = Clear criteria is used on how user stories are prioritized
  • 1 mark = Somewhat clear criteria used
  • 0 marks = Not completed

  Your mark: 2

• Meetings (max 2 marks)

  • 2 marks = Meeting plan described clearly
  • 1 mark = Description is unclear
  • 0 marks = Description is missing; Not completed

  Your mark: 2

• Next phase (max 2 marks)

  • 2 marks = description is clear
  • 1 mark = somewhat clear
  • 0 marks = no description provided

  Your mark: 2

process.md Total Mark: 10 / 10

---

User experience: (max 4 marks)

• User experience is logically related to scenarios (from summary.md) (max 2 marks)

  • 2 marks = Relates well
  • 1 mark = Somewhat related
  • 0 marks = Missing or not related

  Your mark: 2

• Graphic representation is clear and represents well indended user interface elements (max 2 marks)

  • 2 marks = Clear and well done
  • 1 mark = Not very clear,
  • 0 marks = missing or completely unclear

  Your mark: 2

User experience Total Mark: 4 / 4

---

Total Mark

Sprint 0 Total Mark : 47 / 48