ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever et al.
33
Citations
1
Influential Citations
Journal of Aerospace Information Systems
Venue
2021
Year
A policy for six-degree-of-freedom docking maneuvers with rotating targets is developed through reinforcement learning and implemented as a feedback control law. Potential clients for satellite servicing and orbital debris objects are often rotating around a constant axis within their respective Earth orbits. In the context of such missions, reinforcement learning provides an appealing framework for robust, autonomous maneuvers in uncertain environments with low on-board computational cost. This work uses proximal policy optimization to produce a docking policy for rotating or nonrotating targets that is valid over a portion of the six-degree-of-freedom state space while striving to minimize performance and control costs. Experiments using the simulated Apollo transposition and docking maneuver with an induced spin in the lunar module exhibit the policy’s capabilities and provide a comparison with standard optimal control techniques. Furthermore, specific challenges and workarounds, as well as a discussion on the benefits and disadvantages of reinforcement learning for docking policies, are discussed to facilitate future research. As such, this work will serve as a foundation for further investigation of learning-based control laws for spacecraft proximity operations in uncertain environments.
This paper addresses a critical challenge in space operations: autonomous docking with rotating targets. As satellite servicing and orbital debris removal become increasingly important, the ability to perform six-degree-of-freedom docking maneuvers without human intervention is essential. Traditional optimal control methods often require precise models and high computational resources, limiting their applicability in real-time, uncertain space environments. By leveraging reinforcement learning, the authors offer a path toward low-cost, robust onboard control that can adapt to target rotation and other disturbances.
The use of proximal policy optimization (PPO) is particularly significant because it balances sample efficiency and stability, making it suitable for training policies in high-dimensional continuous state spaces like spacecraft dynamics. The paper also provides a direct comparison with optimal control techniques, grounding the RL approach in established aerospace practice. This work thus serves as a bridge between modern machine learning and classical astrodynamics, opening new avenues for autonomous proximity operations.
The paper's key innovations include:
The experiments show that the RL policy successfully docks the chaser spacecraft with a rotating lunar module in simulation. The policy achieves docking with low control costs and performance metrics comparable to those from standard optimal control techniques. While exact numerical metrics (e.g., success rate, docking time, fuel consumption) are not detailed in the abstract, the paper claims the policy is valid over a portion of the state space and provides a foundation for further research. The comparison with optimal control highlights that RL can match traditional methods while offering greater robustness to model uncertainties.
This research has broad implications for the AI and aerospace communities. It demonstrates that reinforcement learning can be applied to safety-critical, high-dimensional control problems in space, where reliability and computational efficiency are paramount. The work encourages further investigation into learning-based control laws for proximity operations, potentially reducing the need for extensive ground-based computation and enabling autonomous missions to service satellites or remove debris. By openly discussing challenges and workarounds, the authors also help guide future researchers in applying RL to real-world aerospace systems.
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever et al.
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer et al.
Douglas M. Bates, Martin Mächler et al.
Diederik P. Kingma, Jimmy Ba