Industry

Fed Study: Programmer Job Growth Halved Since ChatGPT

A Federal Reserve Board study reveals US programmer job growth has nearly halved since ChatGPT's November 2022 launch. Before then, these roles grew at under 5 percent yearly, outpacing the labor market, but now growth has flatlined in key sectors. Adjustments for tech industry pressures still show a three percentage point annual decline, pointing to deliberate cuts in programmer hiring.

Neura News

Neura News

Neura Market Editorial

April 25, 20263 min read
Fed Study: Programmer Job Growth Halved Since ChatGPT

Fed Study: Programmer Job Growth Halved Since ChatGPT

Generative AI has altered daily work for programmers more than most occupations. A Federal Reserve Board study now confirms this change appears in US employment figures. Researchers examined monthly data from a major household survey and matched it against a US Department of Labor database. That database sorts jobs by skills and requirements. This method identifies roles heavy on programming, which make up about 3.7 percent of the US workforce.

Sharp Drop in Growth Rates

Prior to ChatGPT's November 2022 release, jobs rich in programming expanded at nearly 5 percent annually. That rate beat the broader job market. Post-launch, growth slowed dramatically. In areas like IT services and software development, where programmers concentrate, expansion has stalled completely.

Critics might argue tech sector woes explain this. Rate increases, the fade of Covid online service surges, and crypto failures all struck in 2022. To account for such factors, researchers created a counterfactual path. It assumes programmers' share within industries held steady, with only industry sizes shifting. Even adjusted, programmer roles decline by roughly three percentage points yearly. Firms appear to reduce programmer proportions intentionally. Tests on AI-immune occupations show no similar trend.

Not Direct Job Losses

Over three years, this difference equals about 500,000 missing positions without large language models. Authors warn against viewing this as pure job cuts. Aspiring programmers often shift to nearby fields. AI redistributes tasks, embedding programming into other jobs. The analysis misses wider economic ripples. Strong AI productivity gains could boost overall labor demand long-term.

Wages show no evident fall. Impact hits job counts, not pay. Indeed reports software developer postings steady since 2024, with recent upticks. Earlier, postings dropped over half in 2022 and 2023.

Programmer Locations and Timing

The #1 Newsletter in AI

Stay ahead of the AI curve

The most important updates, news, and content — delivered weekly.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Roughly 40 percent of US programmers labor at IT service firms building software for clients, not big tech or startups. This contract area employs most programmers and faces the steepest slowdown. One-third of programmers handle contract development overall.

The employment gap emerged mid-2024, about 1.5 years post-ChatGPT. If AI drives this, firms took time to observe model advances before easing hires. Data unclear if actual gains or anticipated ones prompted cuts.

Other Influences and Checks

AI alone may not explain everything. A 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act rule, effective 2022, spreads research expense deductions over years. Software development qualifies as research, possibly curbing hires. Studies on its effects vary, yet results persist in less-affected sectors.

Causation proves hard amid multiple forces. Researchers tested with history. For bank tellers, it spots ATMs as targeted shock despite bank growth. For seamstresses, it flags offshoring as industry-wide.

Measurement Challenges

No uniform method exists to rank AI-impacted jobs. Half of approaches agree on hardest-hit groups. Programmers stand out: over 98 percent rank highest across all. This aligns with Anthropic Economic Index data, where programming queries exceed one-third of Claude chatbot use.

Future unclear if trends reverse via cheaper coding opening markets, offshore hits, or AI shifting elsewhere. Authors call their work a first step. A Carnegie Mellon and Stanford study notes AI agent efforts center on programming, ignoring bigger economic zones.

The Federal Reserve Board, the US central bank overseeing monetary policy, conducted this analysis using public labor data sources.

Related on Neura Market

More from Neura News

General

Open-weight AI mirrors Kubernetes ecosystem shift

Tobi Knaup, co-founder of Mesosphere, draws parallels between the rise of Kubernetes and the current trajectory of open-weight AI models. He argues that open-weight models are becoming a neutral substrate for innovation, attracting a global ecosystem of developers, startups, and enterprises. The piece warns against US restrictions on Chinese open-weight models, advocating instead for American leadership through open releases, procurement strategies, and standards.

Jul 25·7 min read
General

Open-weight AI mirrors Kubernetes rise, US warned on bans

The author, a Mesosphere co-founder, draws parallels between the rise of Kubernetes and the current open-weight AI ecosystem. He argues that open-weight models are becoming a neutral platform for innovation, and warns that US restrictions on Chinese open-weight models could isolate American developers from a global ecosystem. The piece urges the US to compete by releasing frontier models, using procurement to create demand, building the stack, and setting standards rather than imposing bans.

Jul 25·7 min read
Industry

Power line failure reveals AI data center grid risks and solutions

A fallen power line near Washington, DC caused over 3 gigawatts of data center load to vanish from the PJM grid in seconds, spiking voltage across the region. The event, which made lights flicker from Northern Virginia to Chicago, highlights a growing problem as AI data centers become larger and more concentrated. Experts warn that without better coordination or technology like ON.Energy's battery-backed uninterruptible power supply, such disruptions will become more frequent and severe.

Jul 25·5 min read