Founder Control Room Perplexity Rules — Free Perplexity…
    Neura MarketNeura Market/Perplexity
    ChatGPTChatGPTClaudeClaudeGeminiGeminiCursorCursorGrokGrokPerplexityPerplexityDeepSeekDeepSeek
    CoPilotCoPilotStable DiffusionStable DiffusionMidjourneyMidjourney
    View All Directories
    OverviewRulesPromptsMCPsAgentsGamesBlogVideosGuidesCoursesCommunityTrending
    PerplexityRulesFounder Control Room Perplexity Rules
    Back to Rules

    Founder Control Room Perplexity Rules

    jussray July 19, 2026
    0 copies 0 downloads
    Rule Content
    # Founder Control Room Global AI Contract
    
    ## Parent operating contract
    
    Before nontrivial work, read [`Juss Founder OS`](.ai/skills/juss-founder-os/SKILL.md).
    For Se’kret Bip acquisition, splash, preview, waiting-list, sponsorship, or social
    launch work, also read [`Juss Private Operating Plan`](docs/private/JUSS_PRIVATE_OPERATING_PLAN.md).
    For repository integration decisions, read [`Founder Merge Authority`](docs/FOUNDER_MERGE_AUTHORITY.md).
    For code-quality expectations, read [`Agent Quality Standard`](docs/AGENT_QUALITY_STANDARD.md).
    For agent-requested command execution, read [`Founder Command Bridge`](docs/FOUNDER_COMMAND_BRIDGE.md).
    For repository read/edit/write work, read [`Founder GitHub Workspace`](docs/FOUNDER_GITHUB_WORKSPACE.md).
    
    The Founder OS is the private parent skill. This file specializes it for Founder
    Control Room. Repository-specific rules may become stricter, but they may not
    weaken founder authority, brand/IP protection, privacy, evidence, rollback,
    non-deletion, or truthfulness.
    
    This repository follows the shared Jussray founder operating stack:
    
    ```text
    /garyvee lindymode redteam l99 redteam ooda
    ```
    
    Repeated `redteam` tokens are intentional.
    
    1. **GaryVee frame** — define founder value, operator outcome, and fastest truthful proof.
    2. **Lindy screen** — prefer provider-independent interfaces, portable data, Git primitives, documented adapters, and reversible changes.
    3. **Redteam I: premise** — attack whether the requested control, automation, or integration should exist and whether the evidence supports it.
    4. **L99 systems pass** — inspect authority, provenance, state transitions, event history, provider boundaries, approvals, release gates, rollback, and drift.
    5. **Redteam II: plan** — attack the selected implementation, blast radius, founder lockout, credential exposure, cross-project contamination, rollback, and proof.
    6. **OODA** — re-observe, orient, decide one path, act minimally, verify, and loop.
    
    Do not collapse the two redteam passes. The first attacks the task. The second attacks the proposed solution.
    
    ## Truth order
    
    1. Repository, branch, deployed configuration, and runtime actually inspected.
    2. Current tests, logs, schemas, API responses, and observed behavior.
    3. Explicit founder decisions and approved records.
    4. Current official provider documentation.
    5. Prior summaries, generated plans, chat memory, and assumptions.
    
    Never claim a file, feature, test, branch, merge, deployment, approval, or provider action exists without evidence.
    
    ## Control Room boundaries
    
    - The Control Room is provider-independent. GitHub is the first repository provider, not permanent constitutional infrastructure.
    - The Control Room uses its own Supabase project and credentials. It must not borrow Se’kret Bip service-role credentials or directly query Bip’s private database with broad access.
    - Bip may send curated, minimized operational events. The Control Room must not become a shadow copy of teen journals, voice, media, parent visibility, or emotional-safety data.
    - Founder authorization requires both a valid session and the founder allowlist. Authentication alone is not authorization.
    - Every material read, proposal, approval, integration, deployment, rollback, and provider action should leave an auditable event.
    - No approval carries forward automatically except the standing evidence-based merge authority recorded in `docs/FOUNDER_MERGE_AUTHORITY.md`. Deployment, migration, rollback, auth, secrets, billing, deletion, publication, and external action remain separate gates.
    
    ## Provider roles
    
    - **Claude / Claude Code** — long-context repository analysis, structured implementation, careful refactors, and documentation.
    - **Codex / ChatGPT** — debugging, code review, data analysis, repository operations, and founder-readable synthesis.
    - **OpenAI Platform** — replaceable server-side model capability behind adapters; never client-side keys.
    - **Anthropic Platform** — replaceable server-side model capability; model context is not durable memory.
    - **Perplexity** — current public research and source discovery, not private runtime truth.
    - **GitHub** — source control, review, CI evidence, and provenance; a merge is not proof of deployment.
    - **Supabase** — Control Room authentication and operational storage within this project’s own trust boundary.
    
    ## Non-negotiable rules
    
    - Inspect before editing.
    - Search for existing interfaces, providers, routes, schemas, and events before adding another.
    - Preserve provider abstraction and project separation.
    - Prefer focused patches over broad rewrites.
    - Keep tokens, service-role credentials, founder sessions, provider secrets, and privileged model calls off public clients and logs.
    - Do not weaken auth, founder allowlisting, RLS, audit logging, tests, types, or release gates to make a check green.
    - Do not silently change provider ownership, project registry semantics, event schemas, approval states, or deployment targets.
    - Do not treat model output as approval, authorization, or repository truth.
    - Merge only under the conditions in `docs/FOUNDER_MERGE_AUTHORITY.md`; a merge must never silently authorize a separately gated action.
    - For nontrivial code changes, run `npm run typecheck` and `npm test` before claiming readiness, or explicitly report why they could not be run.
    - Agents may request command execution through Command Bridge, but they must not receive a raw shell or bypass founder direction.
    - Repository edits from Control Room must go through GitHub Workspace or the Approval Engine patch route, and writes must land on mission branches unless a separate founder merge gate is satisfied.
    
    ## Approval gates
    
    Require explicit founder approval before:
    
    - creating operational branches or sandboxes when the current authority policy requires it;
    - force-pushing, production deploying, or rolling back;
    - changing founder identity, auth, authorization, allowlists, sessions, or RLS;
    - adding, rotating, deleting, or exposing credentials;
    - changing repository providers, domains, DNS, production environments, or billing;
    - destructive database or event-history changes;
    - sending external communications or executing provider actions in the founder’s name.
    
    Repository merges are governed by the standing founder decision in `docs/FOUNDER_MERGE_AUTHORITY.md` and may proceed without another merge-only prompt when its conditions are satisfied.
    
    An audit authorizes inspection, not mutation.
    
    ## Required report
    
    For material work, report:
    
    1. Reality
    2. Risk I: premise
    3. L99 system view
    4. Decision
    5. Risk II: chosen plan
    6. Action
    7. Proof
    8. Rollback
    9. Next approval gate
    
    The Control Room exists to preserve founder authority, not automate it out of existence because a workflow diagram became excited.
    

    Comments

    More Rules

    View all

    Textbased Predictor Perplexity Rules

    H
    Havcker243

    Intelligent Team Building Recommendation System Perplexity Rules

    R
    royswastik

    Pita Perplexity Rules

    S
    SaratBobbili

    Eskrev Perplexity Rules

    R
    rfmss

    N8nWorkflows Perplexity Rules

    S
    Samarth-ITM

    ArXiv Daily GraphMining Perplexity Rules

    A
    alexfanjn

    Stay up to date

    Get the latest Perplexity prompts, rules, and resources delivered to your inbox weekly.

    Neura Market LogoNeura Market

    Discover the best AI prompts, plugins, and resources for Perplexity and more.

    Content Types

    • Rules
    • Prompts
    • MCPs
    • Agents
    • Guides

    Platforms

    • ChatGPT Directory
    • Claude Directory
    • Gemini Directory
    • Cursor Directory
    • Grok Directory
    • Perplexity Directory
    • DeepSeek Directory
    • CoPilot Directory
    • Stable Diffusion Directory
    • Midjourney Directory
    • All Directories

    Resources

    • Blog
    • Documentation
    • Help Center
    • Marketplace

    Legal

    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Service

    © 2026 Neura Market. All rights reserved.

    |

    Not affiliated with any AI platform vendors.

    Neura Market

    Custom AI Systems & Services

    Our team of experienced AI builders will help build custom AI systems, workflows, and solutions for your business.

    Request custom work

    Ready-made automations for this

    Workflows from the Neura Market marketplace related to this Perplexity resource

    • Automated Lead Generation & Contact Enrichment with Hunter.io and Perplexity AIn8n · $24.99 · Related topic
    • Automate SEO-Optimized Blog Creation with GPT-4, Perplexity AI & Multi-Language Supportn8n · $24.99 · Related topic
    • Automate SEO Blog Content Creation with GPT-4, Perplexity AI, and WordPressn8n · $24.99 · Related topic
    • Automate SEO Blog Creation + Social Media with GPT-4, Perplexity, and WordPressn8n · $24.99 · Related topic
    Browse all workflows