Security and Compliance
This document outlines the security architecture, controls, and compliance frameworks for the LLM Gateway service.
Security and Compliance
This document outlines the security architecture, controls, and compliance frameworks for the LLM Gateway service.
Table of Contents
- Security Architecture
- Identity and Access Management
- Data Protection
- Network Security
- Infrastructure Security
- Application Security
- Compliance Framework
- Auditing and Logging
- Security Operations
Security Architecture
The LLM Gateway follows a defense-in-depth approach with security controls at multiple layers.
Security Architecture Overview
graph TD
subgraph "External Layer"
WAF[WAF & DDoS Protection]
DNS[DNS Security]
end
subgraph "Network Layer"
VPC[VPC & Subnets]
NACL[Network ACLs]
SG[Security Groups]
end
subgraph "Identity Layer"
IAM[IAM Roles & Policies]
SSO[Single Sign-On]
RBAC[K8s RBAC]
end
subgraph "Application Layer"
Auth[Authentication & Authorization]
Validation[Input Validation]
Secrets[Secrets Management]
end
subgraph "Data Layer"
Encryption[Data Encryption]
Masking[Data Masking]
PII[PII Protection]
end
subgraph "Operational Layer"
Logging[Security Logging]
Monitoring[Security Monitoring]
Scanning[Vulnerability Scanning]
end
External[External Users] --> WAF
WAF --> VPC
VPC --> IAM
IAM --> Auth
Auth --> Encryption
VPC --> NACL --> SG
IAM --> SSO --> RBAC
Auth --> Validation --> Secrets
Encryption --> Masking --> PII
Logging --> Monitoring --> Scanning
Security Principles
The LLM Gateway security architecture is guided by the following principles:
- Zero Trust Architecture: No implicit trust based on network location
- Least Privilege: Minimal access rights for entities
- Defense in Depth: Multiple security controls at different layers
- Secure by Default: Security built in from the beginning
- Security as Code: Security controls defined and deployed as code
- Continuous Verification: Regular testing and validation of controls
Identity and Access Management
The LLM Gateway implements comprehensive identity and access management controls.
IAM Architecture
graph TD
subgraph "Identity Sources"
AD[Active Directory]
OIDC[OIDC Provider]
SAML[SAML Provider]
end
subgraph "Authentication"
SSO[AWS SSO]
Cognito[AWS Cognito]
IAMDB[IAM Identity Center]
end
subgraph "Authorization"
Roles[IAM Roles]
Groups[IAM Groups]
Policies[IAM Policies]
KRBAC[Kubernetes RBAC]
end
subgraph "Service Access"
Service[Service Accounts]
IRSA[IAM Roles for Service Accounts]
ResourcePolicies[Resource Policies]
end
AD --> SSO
OIDC --> Cognito
SAML --> IAMDB
SSO --> Roles
Cognito --> Groups
IAMDB --> Policies
Roles --> KRBAC
Groups --> Service
Policies --> IRSA
KRBAC --> ResourcePolicies
Access Control Model
The LLM Gateway implements a role-based access control (RBAC) model with the following components:
User Roles
| Role | Description | Permissions |
|---|---|---|
| Administrator | System administration | Full access to all resources |
| Operator | Day-to-day operations | Read/write access to operational resources |
| Developer | Development and testing | Read/write access to dev resources |
| Auditor | Compliance auditing | Read-only access to all resources |
| User | End-user of the service | Access to specific API endpoints |
Service Roles
| Role | Purpose | Access Scope |
|---|---|---|
| API Service | Handle API requests | API Gateway, Lambda |
| Execution Service | Execute LLM requests | LLM provider connections, cache |
| Monitoring Service | Collect metrics | CloudWatch, custom metrics |
| Backup Service | Perform backups | S3, RDS, EBS |
Authentication Methods
The LLM Gateway supports multiple authentication methods:
-
API Access:
- API Keys with mandatory rotation
- JWT tokens for short-lived access
- OAuth2 client credentials flow
-
Management Access:
- SAML-based SSO for console access
- MFA enforced for all human users
- Temporary credentials for CLI access
-
Service-to-Service:
- IAM roles for internal AWS services
- Service accounts for Kubernetes resources
- mTLS for critical service communication
Data Protection
The LLM Gateway implements comprehensive data protection measures for data at rest and in transit.
Data Classification
Data is classified according to sensitivity:
| Classification | Examples | Protection Requirements |
|---|---|---|
| Public | Model capabilities, documentation | No special protection required |
| Internal | System metrics, non-sensitive logs | Encryption in transit |
| Confidential | Customer prompt templates, usage analytics | Encryption in transit and at rest |
| Restricted | API keys, credentials, PII in prompts | Encryption, access controls, audit logging |
Encryption Architecture
graph TD
subgraph "Key Management"
KMS[AWS KMS]
CMK[Customer Managed Keys]
KeyPolicies[Key Policies]
end
subgraph "Data at Rest"
S3[S3 Encryption]
RDS[RDS Encryption]
EBS[EBS Encryption]
Secrets[Secrets Manager]
end
subgraph "Data in Transit"
TLS[TLS 1.3]
HTTPS[HTTPS Endpoints]
VPCEndpoints[VPC Endpoints]
end
KMS --> CMK --> KeyPolicies
CMK --> S3
CMK --> RDS
CMK --> EBS
CMK --> Secrets
TLS --> HTTPS
TLS --> VPCEndpoints
Encryption Implementation
-
Data at Rest:
- RDS with AWS KMS encryption (AES-256)
- S3 with server-side encryption
- EBS volumes encrypted by default
- ElastiCache with encryption enabled
- Secrets Manager with KMS encryption
-
Data in Transit:
- TLS 1.3 for all API endpoints
- TLS for all internal service communication
- mTLS for critical service interfaces
- VPC endpoints for AWS service access
Data Handling Controls
-
PII Handling:
- PII detection in prompt content
- Automated redaction capabilities
- Strict access controls for PII data
- Retention limits for sensitive data
-
Data Minimization:
- Collection limited to necessary data
- Automated data purging workflows
- Anonymization for analytics data
- Temporary storage for transient data
Network Security
The LLM Gateway implements multiple layers of network security controls.
Network Architecture
graph TD
Internet((Internet)) --> Route53[Route 53]
Route53 --> WAF[AWS WAF]
WAF --> ALB[Application Load Balancer]
subgraph "VPC"
subgraph "Public Subnets"
ALB
NAT[NAT Gateway]
end
subgraph "Application Subnets"
EKS[EKS Cluster]
ALB --> EKS
end
subgraph "Database Subnets"
RDS[(RDS Database)]
ElastiCache[(ElastiCache)]
EKS --> RDS
EKS --> ElastiCache
end
EKS --> NAT
NAT --> Internet
VPCEndpoint[VPC Endpoints]
EKS --> VPCEndpoint
end
subgraph "AWS Services"
S3[(S3)]
SM[(Secrets Manager)]
ECR[(ECR)]
CW[(CloudWatch)]
end
VPCEndpoint --> S3
VPCEndpoint --> SM
VPCEndpoint --> ECR
VPCEndpoint --> CW
Network Security Controls
-
VPC Configuration:
- Isolated VPC with private subnets
- Public subnets only for load balancers
- No direct internet access from application layer
- VPC flow logs enabled for network monitoring
-
Access Controls:
- Security groups with least-privilege rules
- Network ACLs as subnet-level firewalls
- Service security groups for fine-grained control
- Default deny for all ingress/egress traffic
-
Traffic Protection:
- WAF for application layer protection
- Shield Advanced for DDoS protection
- TLS termination at load balancer
- Private API Gateway endpoints
-
Service Isolation:
- Kubernetes network policies
- Service mesh for inter-service TLS
- Namespace isolation for service boundaries
- Micro-segmentation for critical services
Infrastructure Security
The LLM Gateway employs multiple infrastructure security controls.
Infrastructure Hardening
-
Compute Resources:
- Hardened AMIs for EC2 instances
- Regular patching through automation
- Immutable infrastructure approach
- Host-based intrusion detection
-
Container Security:
- Image scanning in CI/CD pipeline
- Minimal base images
- Non-root container execution
- Image signing and verification
-
Kubernetes Security:
- Pod security policies
- Admission controllers
- Security context constraints
- Control plane security
Vulnerability Management
flowchart TD
subgraph "Vulnerability Sources"
SAST[Static Analysis]
DAST[Dynamic Analysis]
SCA[Dependency Scanning]
Image[Container Scanning]
Infra[Infrastructure Scanning]
end
subgraph "Vulnerability Management"
Triage[Vulnerability Triage]
Prioritize[Risk Prioritization]
Remediate[Remediation]
Verify[Verification]
end
SAST & DAST & SCA & Image & Infra --> Triage
Triage --> Prioritize
Prioritize --> Remediate
Remediate --> Verify
Verify -->|Continuous| SAST
- Scanning Schedule:
| Asset Type | Tool | Frequency | Integration Point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source Code | SonarQube, Snyk | On commit | CI/CD pipeline |
| Dependencies | Dependabot, Snyk | Daily | Repository |
| Container Images | Trivy, ECR scanning | On build | CI/CD pipeline |
| Infrastructure | Prowler, ScoutSuite | Weekly | Scheduled scan |
| Runtime | Falco | Continuous | Kubernetes |
- Remediation SLAs:
| Severity | Timeframe | Approval Process |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | 24 hours | Emergency change |
| High | 7 days | Expedited review |
| Medium | 30 days | Standard review |
| Low | 90 days | Batch process |
Application Security
The LLM Gateway includes multiple application security controls.
Secure Development Practices
-
Secure SDLC:
- Security requirements definition
- Threat modeling for new features
- Security code reviews
- Secure coding guidelines
-
Security Testing:
- Unit tests for security controls
- Integration testing for security features
- Penetration testing (quarterly)
- Fuzz testing for API endpoints
API Security
-
Input Validation:
- Schema validation for all inputs
- Strict type checking
- Input sanitization
- Maximum size limits
-
Output Encoding:
- Content security policy implementation
- Safe output encoding
- Response validation
- Error message scrubbing
-
Rate Limiting:
- Per-endpoint rate limits
- Per-user quotas
- Graduated response to abusive traffic
- Automated abuse detection
Prompt Security
-
Prompt Injection Protection:
- Prompt boundary enforcement
- Context isolation
- Input sanitization
- Dangerous pattern detection
-
LLM Output Safety:
- Content filtering
- Toxicity detection
- PII detection in responses
- Output validation
Compliance Framework
The LLM Gateway is designed to meet various compliance requirements.
Compliance Certifications
The service is compliant with or designed to support:
| Framework | Status | Scope | Last Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 Type II | Certified | Security, Availability, Confidentiality | Q2 2023 |
| ISO 27001 | Certified | Information Security Management | Q2 2023 |
| GDPR | Compliant | Data Protection | Q1 2023 |
| HIPAA | BAA Available | For healthcare customers | Q3 2023 |
| FedRAMP Moderate | In Progress | For government customers | Expected Q4 2023 |
Compliance Controls Mapping
graph TD
subgraph "Control Frameworks"
SOC2[SOC 2]
ISO[ISO 27001]
GDPR[GDPR]
HIPAA[HIPAA]
FedRAMP[FedRAMP]
end
subgraph "Control Categories"
IAM[Identity & Access]
Config[Secure Configuration]
DataProt[Data Protection]
Incident[Incident Response]
BCP[Business Continuity]
SecOps[Security Operations]
end
SOC2 --> IAM & Config & DataProt & Incident & BCP & SecOps
ISO --> IAM & Config & DataProt & Incident & BCP & SecOps
GDPR --> IAM & DataProt & Incident
HIPAA --> IAM & DataProt & Incident & BCP
FedRAMP --> IAM & Config & DataProt & Incident & BCP & SecOps
IAM --> IAMControls[IAM Controls Implementation]
Config --> ConfigControls[Configuration Controls]
DataProt --> DataControls[Data Protection Controls]
Incident --> IncidentControls[Incident Response Controls]
BCP --> BCPControls[BCP Controls]
SecOps --> SecOpsControls[SecOps Controls]
Compliance Documentation
The following compliance documentation is maintained:
-
System Security Plan (SSP):
- Comprehensive system description
- Control implementation details
- Risk assessment results
- Continuous monitoring approach
-
Policies and Procedures:
- Information security policy
- Access control policy
- Data protection policy
- Incident response procedures
- Change management procedures
- Backup and recovery procedures
-
Compliance Evidence:
- Control testing results
- Vulnerability scanning reports
- Penetration testing reports
- Audit logs and reviews
- Access reviews
- Training records
Auditing and Logging
The LLM Gateway implements comprehensive audit logging for security and compliance purposes.
Logging Architecture
graph TD
subgraph "Log Sources"
App[Application Logs]
Infra[Infrastructure Logs]
Network[Network Logs]
DB[Database Logs]
Security[Security Logs]
end
subgraph "Collection & Processing"
Fluent[FluentBit]
Stream[Kinesis Data Streams]
Firehose[Kinesis Firehose]
Lambda[Lambda Enrichment]
end
subgraph "Storage & Analysis"
S3[S3 Bucket]
ES[Elasticsearch]
CW[CloudWatch Logs]
Athena[Athena]
end
subgraph "Monitoring & Alerting"
Rules[Alert Rules]
SIEM[Security Information & Event Management]
Dashboard[Security Dashboards]
end
App & Infra & Network & DB & Security --> Fluent
Fluent --> Stream
Stream --> Firehose
Stream --> Lambda
Firehose --> S3
Lambda --> ES
Lambda --> CW
S3 --> Athena
ES & CW & Athena --> Rules
ES & CW & Athena --> SIEM
ES & CW & Athena --> Dashboard
Logged Events
The following security events are logged:
-
Authentication Events:
- Authentication attempts (successful and failed)
- Token issuance and validation
- Session management
- Privilege changes
-
Authorization Events:
- Authorization decisions
- Permission changes
- Access denials
- Privilege escalation
-
Data Access Events:
- Sensitive data access
- Data modifications
- Bulk data exports
- Unusual data access patterns
-
Administrative Events:
- Configuration changes
- Security control modifications
- User and role management
- Policy changes
-
System Events:
- Service starts and stops
- System failures
- Resource exhaustion
- Security boundary violations
Log Management
Logs are managed according to the following policies:
-
Retention:
- Security logs: 1 year
- Compliance-related logs: 7 years
- Operational logs: 90 days
- Debug logs: 7 days
-
Protection:
- Immutable storage in S3
- Encryption at rest
- Access controls on log data
- Integrity verification
-
Monitoring:
- Real-time alerting for critical events
- Automated log analysis
- Anomaly detection
- Correlation across log sources
Security Operations
The LLM Gateway is supported by a Security Operations Center (SOC) that provides continuous monitoring and incident response.
Security Monitoring
The following security monitoring is performed:
-
Continuous Monitoring:
- Real-time log analysis
- Network traffic analysis
- Behavior anomaly detection
- Threat intelligence integration
-
Scheduled Assessments:
- Vulnerability scanning
- Configuration compliance checks
- Security control effectiveness testing
- Access reviews
Incident Response
flowchart LR
subgraph "Detection Phase"
Monitor[Security Monitoring]
Auto[Automated Detection]
Manual[Manual Report]
end
subgraph "Response Phase"
Triage[Incident Triage]
Contain[Containment]
Eradicate[Eradication]
Recover[Recovery]
end
subgraph "Post-Incident Phase"
Analysis[Root Cause Analysis]
Lessons[Lessons Learned]
Improvement[Control Improvement]
end
Monitor & Auto & Manual --> Triage
Triage --> Contain --> Eradicate --> Recover
Recover --> Analysis --> Lessons --> Improvement
Improvement -.-> Monitor
- Incident Response Process:
| Phase | Activities | Timeframe | Documentation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preparation | Playbooks, training, tools | Ongoing | IR plan, runbooks |
| Detection | Monitoring, alerts, reports | Real-time | Alert records |
| Analysis | Triage, impact assessment | 30 minutes | Incident ticket |
| Containment | Isolation, traffic blocking | 1-2 hours | Action log |
| Eradication | Malware removal, fixing vulnerabilities | 4-24 hours | Remediation log |
| Recovery | Service restoration, verification | 2-8 hours | Recovery report |
| Lessons Learned | Root cause analysis, improvements | 7 days | Post-mortem report |
- Incident Severity Levels:
| Severity | Description | Response Time | Notification | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | Service-wide security breach | Immediate | All stakeholders | Data breach, system compromise |
| High | Limited security breach | < 1 hour | Security, engineering, leadership | Unauthorized access, targeted attack |
| Medium | Security policy violation | < 4 hours | Security, engineering | Misconfiguration, policy violation |
| Low | Potential security issue | < 24 hours | Security team | Suspicious activity, minor vulnerability |
Previous: Disaster Recovery & Backup Strategy | Next: README
Related Documents
MCP Server Specification: Grok Discussion Server
A standalone Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables intelligent discussions with Grok-4 AI, featuring context-aware conversations, baseline document generation, and response management.
C13.6: DAG Visualization & Workflow Security
> **Parent:** [C13 Monitoring, Logging & Anomaly Detection](C13-Monitoring-and-Logging)
π Encryption & Hashing Reference Guide
**Data Security System - Complete Cryptographic Specification**
AI Agent Platform as a Service β High-Level Design
**Document ID:** ARCH-HLD-380