ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever et al.
1
Citations
0
Influential Citations
—
Venue
2026
Year
Frontier AI systems are bridging the gap between intelligence and utility by shifting from conversational assistants to autonomous agents that execute tasks end to end. Using production data from Perplexity's Search and Computer products, we study this transition by examining how AI agents accelerate and reshape knowledge work. Three key empirical findings emerge. First, using sessions with near-identical initial query pairs as natural experiments for the same underlying task attempted with both products, Computer performs 26 minutes of autonomous work per user session, versus 33 seconds for Search. Computer automates task decomposition and execution that Search users might otherwise manually orchestrate and implement. As a result, Computer shifts follow-up query distribution toward higher-order work such as verification and extension. Autonomy also increases execution quality, with per-query dissatisfaction rates 55% lower on Computer than on Search. Second, due to its autonomy advantage, Computer reduces completion time from 269 to 36 minutes on matched tasks, lowering estimated time and cost by 87% and 94%, respectively, compared to humans equipped with Search alone. Third, Computer changes the scope of work that users attempt: Computer queries more often cross occupational boundaries, require higher-order cognition, draw on broader expertise, take the form of composite tasks that bundle interdependent subtasks into a single query, and unlock work activities that are essentially absent from Search usage among the same users. Together, the evidence indicates that AI agents accelerate workflows, enhance output quality, reduce costs, and expand the breadth and depth of automated work.
This paper provides the first large-scale empirical evidence of how autonomous AI agents transform knowledge work, moving beyond conversational assistants to end-to-end task execution. By leveraging production data from Perplexity's Search and Computer products, the authors offer concrete metrics on time savings, cost reductions, and quality improvements that are directly relevant to AI practitioners deploying agentic systems. The findings challenge the prevailing view of AI as a copilot, instead positioning agents as autonomous workers that can independently decompose, execute, and verify complex tasks.
The study's use of natural experiments—comparing sessions with near-identical initial queries across two product modes—strengthens causal claims about the impact of autonomy. This methodological rigor is rare in industry AI research and makes the results actionable for product teams designing agentic workflows.
Key metrics from the study:
These results demonstrate that AI agents not only accelerate existing workflows but also enable entirely new categories of work, fundamentally reshaping what knowledge workers can accomplish.
This research has profound implications for the AI field and knowledge work at large. It provides a blueprint for evaluating agentic systems in production, offering metrics that go beyond simple accuracy to capture autonomy, efficiency, and task expansion. For AI practitioners, the findings suggest that investing in agentic capabilities—task decomposition, autonomous execution, and verification—can yield order-of-magnitude improvements in productivity.
The paper also raises important questions about the future of work: as agents automate not just individual tasks but entire workflows, the role of human workers may shift toward oversight, exception handling, and strategic direction. The evidence that agents expand the breadth and depth of work attempted suggests that AI could augment human capabilities rather than simply replace them, potentially leading to new forms of human-AI collaboration.
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever et al.
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer et al.
Douglas M. Bates, Martin Mächler et al.
Diederik P. Kingma, Jimmy Ba