Preprint
Reinforcement Learning

How AI Agents Reshape Knowledge Work

Jeremy Yang, Kathryn Zyskowski, Noah Yonack, Jerry Ma
June 5, 20261 citations

1

Citations

0

Influential Citations

Venue

2026

Year

Abstract

Frontier AI systems are bridging the gap between intelligence and utility by shifting from conversational assistants to autonomous agents that execute tasks end to end. Using production data from Perplexity's Search and Computer products, we study this transition by examining how AI agents accelerate and reshape knowledge work. Three key empirical findings emerge. First, using sessions with near-identical initial query pairs as natural experiments for the same underlying task attempted with both products, Computer performs 26 minutes of autonomous work per user session, versus 33 seconds for Search. Computer automates task decomposition and execution that Search users might otherwise manually orchestrate and implement. As a result, Computer shifts follow-up query distribution toward higher-order work such as verification and extension. Autonomy also increases execution quality, with per-query dissatisfaction rates 55% lower on Computer than on Search. Second, due to its autonomy advantage, Computer reduces completion time from 269 to 36 minutes on matched tasks, lowering estimated time and cost by 87% and 94%, respectively, compared to humans equipped with Search alone. Third, Computer changes the scope of work that users attempt: Computer queries more often cross occupational boundaries, require higher-order cognition, draw on broader expertise, take the form of composite tasks that bundle interdependent subtasks into a single query, and unlock work activities that are essentially absent from Search usage among the same users. Together, the evidence indicates that AI agents accelerate workflows, enhance output quality, reduce costs, and expand the breadth and depth of automated work.

Analysis

Why This Paper Matters

This paper provides the first large-scale empirical evidence of how autonomous AI agents transform knowledge work, moving beyond conversational assistants to end-to-end task execution. By leveraging production data from Perplexity's Search and Computer products, the authors offer concrete metrics on time savings, cost reductions, and quality improvements that are directly relevant to AI practitioners deploying agentic systems. The findings challenge the prevailing view of AI as a copilot, instead positioning agents as autonomous workers that can independently decompose, execute, and verify complex tasks.

The study's use of natural experiments—comparing sessions with near-identical initial queries across two product modes—strengthens causal claims about the impact of autonomy. This methodological rigor is rare in industry AI research and makes the results actionable for product teams designing agentic workflows.

Technical Contributions

  • Autonomy quantification: Measures that Computer agents perform 26 minutes of autonomous work per session versus 33 seconds for Search, a 47x increase in automated task execution.
  • Quality improvement: Per-query dissatisfaction rates are 55% lower on Computer than Search, indicating that autonomy does not sacrifice quality for speed.
  • Task scope expansion: Computer queries more often cross occupational boundaries, require higher-order cognition (e.g., verification, extension), and bundle interdependent subtasks into single queries—activities largely absent from Search usage.
  • Cost efficiency: Estimated time and cost reductions of 87% and 94% respectively on matched tasks, from 269 to 36 minutes completion time.

Results

Key metrics from the study:

  • Autonomous work per session: 26 minutes (Computer) vs 33 seconds (Search)
  • Dissatisfaction rate: 55% lower on Computer
  • Completion time: 36 minutes (Computer) vs 269 minutes (Search + human)
  • Cost reduction: 94% compared to human with Search
  • Task scope: Computer enables cross-occupational, higher-order, and composite tasks that are absent in Search usage

These results demonstrate that AI agents not only accelerate existing workflows but also enable entirely new categories of work, fundamentally reshaping what knowledge workers can accomplish.

Significance

This research has profound implications for the AI field and knowledge work at large. It provides a blueprint for evaluating agentic systems in production, offering metrics that go beyond simple accuracy to capture autonomy, efficiency, and task expansion. For AI practitioners, the findings suggest that investing in agentic capabilities—task decomposition, autonomous execution, and verification—can yield order-of-magnitude improvements in productivity.

The paper also raises important questions about the future of work: as agents automate not just individual tasks but entire workflows, the role of human workers may shift toward oversight, exception handling, and strategic direction. The evidence that agents expand the breadth and depth of work attempted suggests that AI could augment human capabilities rather than simply replace them, potentially leading to new forms of human-AI collaboration.