ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever et al.
1.9k
Citations
44
Influential Citations
Social Science Information
Venue
1983
Year
This article is the story of a summer shock, my encounter with the manuscript of a book. And what happened little by little. A fragmented and incomplete narrative. He wanted to see things “irreducible and festive”! That's Bruno Latour's youthful, resonant cry.And so it was, my electroshock when I read “Irréductions”, the second part of “Microbes, War and Peace” « The pasteurization France (1984), on a mediterranean beach in July 1981, under a friendly blue sun, and a breeze for playful sails. In the previous decade, I had already been shaken, oh so much! by a thunderclap in an August-lit sky, by the publication of Anti-Œdipe: 1972. The shock was renewed nine years later with the publication of Mille Plateaux. What a decade and what a world, beginning with the Soviet army's entry into the war in Afghanistan! A living crack in « Communism in action », leading to its collapse. This article also attempts to express the gradual, hesitant emergence of doubt about the effects of insomniac reason. And of the development of “hypercontrol” societies.
This paper, published in 1983, is a seminal contribution to the field of scientometrics and the sociology of science. It introduces co-word analysis, a method that uses the co-occurrence of keywords in scientific publications to map the structure and dynamics of research fields. The paper is significant because it provides a quantitative, network-based approach to understanding how scientific knowledge is organized and evolves over time, moving beyond qualitative case studies.
The work is deeply rooted in actor-network theory (ANT), co-developed by Bruno Latour and Michel Callon. It conceptualizes scientific activity as a process of translation and network building, where actors (researchers, institutions, concepts) are linked through shared problems and solutions. Co-word analysis operationalizes this theory by treating keywords as traces of these translations, allowing researchers to visualize the 'problematization' of a field.
The paper does not present quantitative results in the traditional sense (e.g., accuracy metrics). Instead, it demonstrates the method through illustrative examples, such as mapping the field of polymer chemistry. These examples show that co-word networks can reveal the central role of certain concepts (e.g., 'catalysis') and the clustering of research around specific problematizations. The method's validity is argued through its ability to reproduce known historical developments in science.
Co-word analysis has had a lasting impact on the field of scientometrics and beyond. It is a precursor to modern science mapping techniques, including co-citation analysis and bibliographic coupling. The method has been widely used for research evaluation, technology foresight, and innovation policy. The paper's integration of quantitative methods with sociological theory has influenced subsequent work in science and technology studies (STS). Today, co-word analysis remains a standard tool for analyzing large-scale scientific corpora, and its principles underpin many contemporary bibliometric and altmetric approaches.
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever et al.
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer et al.
Douglas M. Bates, Martin Mächler et al.
Diederik P. Kingma, Jimmy Ba