ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever et al.
0
Citations
0
Influential Citations
—
Venue
2026
Year
Bitcoin price prediction on sub-daily timescales is a hard open problem in computational finance. Bitcoin exhibits fat-tailed returns, non-stationary dynamics, and a price discovery process influenced by social discourse on Reddit and Twitter. Conventional approaches fuse OHLCV technical features with sentiment via static concatenation, applying identical fusion weights regardless of market state. This is inconsistent with the behavioural finance literature, which shows that retail sentiment is most predictive during volatile periods and noisy during calm ones. This paper proposes Regime-Aware Multi-Modal Learning (RAML), which conditions fusion of sentiment and price features on a dynamically detected binary market regime. Rolling 24-hour volatility partitions observations into stable and volatile regimes; a learnable sigmoid gate adjusts the weight of the sentiment embedding relative to the price embedding, trusting sentiment more during volatility and price dynamics more during stable phases. The system is evaluated on 3,491 hourly observations (July 2024-September 2025), combining Bitcoin OHLCV data with Reddit /r/Bitcoin FinBERT sentiment. Four models are compared - price-only BiLSTM, sentiment-only classifier, static-concatenation BiLSTM, and RAML - across 3-hour and 6-hour horizons, with an ablation study isolating the sentiment branch, regime detection, and adaptive fusion. RAML achieves macro-F1 of 0.5474 (3h) and 0.5513 (6h), with the highest AUC at 3 hours (0.5084), indicating better calibration. Ablation confirms every component is necessary, and replacing adaptive weighting with concatenation causes recall collapse at 6 hours (F1: 0.14). These results establish regime-conditioned adaptive fusion as a necessary design principle for multi-modal financial forecasting.
Bitcoin price prediction on sub-daily timescales remains a hard open problem due to fat-tailed returns, non-stationary dynamics, and the influence of social discourse. While prior work has fused OHLCV technical features with social sentiment (e.g., from Reddit and Twitter), most approaches use static concatenation, applying identical fusion weights regardless of market state. This paper identifies a critical flaw in that design: behavioral finance literature shows retail sentiment is most predictive during volatile periods and noisy during calm ones. By proposing a regime-aware adaptive fusion mechanism, the paper directly addresses this mismatch, offering a principled way to modulate modality importance based on market conditions.
From a practitioner's perspective, this work is significant because it moves beyond one-size-fits-all fusion strategies. The ablation study starkly demonstrates that static concatenation can cause recall collapse at longer horizons (F1 drops to 0.14 at 6 hours), while the adaptive approach maintains performance. This suggests that many existing multi-modal financial models may be suboptimal, especially for longer prediction windows.
RAML is evaluated on 3,491 hourly observations from July 2024 to September 2025, combining Bitcoin OHLCV data with Reddit /r/Bitcoin FinBERT sentiment. Four models are compared: price-only BiLSTM, sentiment-only classifier, static-concatenation BiLSTM, and RAML, across 3-hour and 6-hour horizons.
This paper establishes regime-conditioned adaptive fusion as a necessary design principle for multi-modal financial forecasting. The core insight—that modality relevance varies with market state—is likely transferable to other domains where context determines which data sources are most informative (e.g., medical diagnosis, autonomous driving). For AI practitioners, the work provides a concrete, implementable architecture (rolling volatility detection + sigmoid gate) that can be integrated into existing multi-modal pipelines. The ablation results serve as a cautionary tale: static fusion can actively harm performance, especially when modality reliability shifts over time. Future work could extend this to multi-class regimes, other asset classes, or more sophisticated volatility estimators.
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever et al.
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer et al.
Douglas M. Bates, Martin Mächler et al.
Diederik P. Kingma, Jimmy Ba