ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever et al.
2.2k
Citations
0
Influential Citations
MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society)
Venue
2012
Year
We propose a framework for analyzing and comparing distributions, which we use to construct statistical tests to determine if two samples are drawn from different distributions. Our test statistic is the largest difference in expectations over functions in the unit ball of a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS), and is called the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD).We present two distributionfree tests based on large deviation bounds for the MMD, and a third test based on the asymptotic distribution of this statistic. The MMD can be computed in quadratic time, although efficient linear time approximations are available. Our statistic is an instance of an integral probability metric, and various classical metrics on distributions are obtained when alternative function classes are used in place of an RKHS. We apply our two-sample tests to a variety of problems, including attribute matching for databases using the Hungarian marriage method, where they perform strongly. Excellent performance is also obtained when comparing distributions over graphs, for which these are the first such tests.
This paper addresses a fundamental problem in statistics and machine learning: determining whether two samples originate from the same distribution. The proposed maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) provides a principled, kernel-based approach that is both theoretically grounded and practically effective. By leveraging reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces, the method captures differences in high-dimensional moments without explicit density estimation, making it widely applicable.
The work is significant because it unifies several classical metrics (e.g., Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Earth Mover's distance) under the umbrella of integral probability metrics, while offering a computationally tractable statistic. The three proposed tests—two non-asymptotic and one asymptotic—give practitioners flexibility depending on sample size and desired guarantees. The application to graph-structured data was particularly novel at the time, opening up new avenues for comparing complex objects.
The paper's key innovations include:
The paper reports strong empirical performance on synthetic and real-world datasets. For attribute matching, the MMD-based test outperforms baseline methods when combined with the Hungarian marriage method. On graph comparison tasks, the tests successfully distinguish between different graph distributions (e.g., from different generative models). The asymptotic test achieves correct Type I error control at standard significance levels. No explicit numerical metrics (e.g., accuracy, p-values) are provided in the abstract, but the paper claims excellent performance across all experiments.
This work has had a lasting impact on the field. The MMD is now a standard tool for two-sample testing, used in areas such as generative adversarial network evaluation, domain adaptation, and causal inference. The theoretical framework has inspired numerous extensions, including conditional MMD, kernelized Stein discrepancy, and deep kernel methods. The paper's clear exposition and practical algorithms have made it a cornerstone of modern nonparametric hypothesis testing.
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever et al.
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer et al.
Douglas M. Bates, Martin Mächler et al.
Diederik P. Kingma, Jimmy Ba